diff options
| author | Case Duckworth | 2015-03-14 11:33:26 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Case Duckworth | 2015-03-14 11:33:26 -0700 |
| commit | 5685e1dba9b485939c833ba86f4e5c2e5e34453b (patch) | |
| tree | f61602ba63e905e9bc7033ad06e790e7356e4dc6 /philosophy.html | |
| parent | Move test suite into its own folder (diff) | |
| download | autocento-5685e1dba9b485939c833ba86f4e5c2e5e34453b.tar.gz autocento-5685e1dba9b485939c833ba86f4e5c2e5e34453b.zip | |
Mostly fix #11: Dedication/epigraph alignment
So the issue is solved in terms of how it looks, though it adds a gross extra div into every page and uses :only-child, which I don't think is super-supported. But it's the best I can do that I know of until we get to better flexbox support. Or you know, maybe later I can try doing some templating fixes-- injecting classes so that normally, .dedication is right-aligned but when an epigraph is present, change the class to .dedication-left or something. IDK. Either way is sort of ugly. :(
Diffstat (limited to 'philosophy.html')
| -rw-r--r-- | philosophy.html | 6 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 2 deletions
| diff --git a/philosophy.html b/philosophy.html index 2861376..766971e 100644 --- a/philosophy.html +++ b/philosophy.html | |||
| @@ -34,8 +34,10 @@ | |||
| 34 | <h1 class="title">Philosophy</h1> | 34 | <h1 class="title">Philosophy</h1> |
| 35 | 35 | ||
| 36 | 36 | ||
| 37 | 37 | <div class="header-extra"> | |
| 38 | </header> | 38 | |
| 39 | </div> | ||
| 40 | </header> | ||
| 39 | 41 | ||
| 40 | 42 | ||
| 41 | <section class="content prose"><p>Importance is important. But meaning is meaningful. Here we are at the crux of the matter, for both meaning and importance are also human-formed. So it would seem that nothing is important or meaningful, if importance and meaning are of themselves only products of the fallible human intellect. But here is the great secret: <em>so is the fallibility of the human intellect a mere product of the fallible human intellect.</em> The question here arises: Is anything real, and not a mere invention of a mistaken human mind? By real of course I mean “that which is <em>on its own terms</em>,” that is, without any <a href="i-am.html">modification</a> on the part of mankind by observing it. But such a thing is impossible to be known, for if it be known it has certainly been observed by someone, and so it is not on its own terms but on the terms of the observer. So it cannot be known if anything exists on its own terms, for it exists on its own terms we certainly will not know anything about it.</p> | 43 | <section class="content prose"><p>Importance is important. But meaning is meaningful. Here we are at the crux of the matter, for both meaning and importance are also human-formed. So it would seem that nothing is important or meaningful, if importance and meaning are of themselves only products of the fallible human intellect. But here is the great secret: <em>so is the fallibility of the human intellect a mere product of the fallible human intellect.</em> The question here arises: Is anything real, and not a mere invention of a mistaken human mind? By real of course I mean “that which is <em>on its own terms</em>,” that is, without any <a href="i-am.html">modification</a> on the part of mankind by observing it. But such a thing is impossible to be known, for if it be known it has certainly been observed by someone, and so it is not on its own terms but on the terms of the observer. So it cannot be known if anything exists on its own terms, for it exists on its own terms we certainly will not know anything about it.</p> |