about summary refs log tree commit diff stats
path: root/philosophy.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorCase Duckworth2015-03-02 18:31:47 -0700
committerCase Duckworth2015-03-02 18:31:47 -0700
commit9a2e2a9c3e0396f956381b8ee4af80fe3e8cf652 (patch)
tree7f6f171760ba416ba3c0324f1b1ef6b02dadb52a /philosophy.html
parentAdd fonts: Playfair, Fira, Courier Prime (diff)
downloadautocento-9a2e2a9c3e0396f956381b8ee4af80fe3e8cf652.tar.gz
autocento-9a2e2a9c3e0396f956381b8ee4af80fe3e8cf652.zip
Add thing class to pieces in template; recompile
Diffstat (limited to 'philosophy.html')
-rw-r--r--philosophy.html2
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/philosophy.html b/philosophy.html index 1736c09..6704235 100644 --- a/philosophy.html +++ b/philosophy.html
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@
24 24
25 </header> 25 </header>
26 26
27 <section class="prose"> 27 <section class="thing prose">
28 <p>Importance is important. But meaning is meaningful. Here we are at the crux of the matter, for both meaning and importance are also human-formed. So it would seem that nothing is important or meaningful, if importance and meaning are of themselves only products of the fallible human intellect. But here is the great secret: <em>so is the fallibility of the human intellect a mere product of the fallible human intellect.</em> The question here arises: Is anything real, and not a mere invention of a mistaken human mind? By real of course I mean “that which is <em>on its own terms</em>,” that is, without any <a href="i-am.html">modification</a> on the part of mankind by observing it. But such a thing is impossible to be known, for if it be known it has certainly been observed by someone, and so it is not on its own terms but on the terms of the observer. So it cannot be known if anything exists on its own terms, for it exists on its own terms we certainly will not know anything about it.</p> 28 <p>Importance is important. But meaning is meaningful. Here we are at the crux of the matter, for both meaning and importance are also human-formed. So it would seem that nothing is important or meaningful, if importance and meaning are of themselves only products of the fallible human intellect. But here is the great secret: <em>so is the fallibility of the human intellect a mere product of the fallible human intellect.</em> The question here arises: Is anything real, and not a mere invention of a mistaken human mind? By real of course I mean “that which is <em>on its own terms</em>,” that is, without any <a href="i-am.html">modification</a> on the part of mankind by observing it. But such a thing is impossible to be known, for if it be known it has certainly been observed by someone, and so it is not on its own terms but on the terms of the observer. So it cannot be known if anything exists on its own terms, for it exists on its own terms we certainly will not know anything about it.</p>
29 <p>By this it is possible to see that nothing is knowable without the mediating factor of our mind fucking up the “<a href="spittle.html">raw</a>,” the “real” world. But by this time it would seem that this chapter is far far too philosophical, not to mention pretentious, so I must try again.</p> 29 <p>By this it is possible to see that nothing is knowable without the mediating factor of our mind fucking up the “<a href="spittle.html">raw</a>,” the “real” world. But by this time it would seem that this chapter is far far too philosophical, not to mention pretentious, so I must try again.</p>
30 </section> 30 </section>