1 files changed, 39 insertions, 40 deletions

@@ -19,52 +19,51 @@ project:
       link: ouroboros_memory
 ...
 
-[God is love][], they say, but there [is][] \
-no god.  Therefore, how can there be love?  \
-And if there is no love, how can there be God?  \
-There are things in life, I suppose, \
-that are simply unanswerable mysteries \
-of existence.  Maybe this God and love are one.
+| [God is love][], they say, but there [is][]
+| no god.  Therefore, how can there be love?
+| And if there is no love, how can there be God?
+| There are things in life, I suppose,
+| that are simply unanswerable mysteries
+| of existence.  Maybe this God and love are one.
 
-Maybe there are many loves, instead of one.  \
-The difference between [what isn't][] and what is \
-could merely be one of scope.  The mystery \
-is how we speak only of one love--- \
-to act as though we know we are supposed \
-to love only one other, or that one other and God.
+| Maybe there are many loves, instead of one.
+| The difference between [what isn't][] and what is
+| could merely be one of scope.  The mystery
+| is how we speak only of one love---
+| to act as though we know we are supposed
+| to love only one other, or that one other and God.
 
-But supposing that one other is God?  \
-What then?  Is the God-lover to walk alone, \
-supported by God only when He feels He is supposed \
-to support her?  What kind of love is \
-this?  I would argue in fact this isn't love, \
-this [one-set-of-footprints-in-the-sand][] mystery.
+| But supposing that one other is God?
+| What then?  Is the God-lover to walk alone,
+| supported by God only when He feels He is supposed
+| to support her?  What kind of love is
+| this?  I would argue in fact this isn't love,
+| this [one-set-of-footprints-in-the-sand][] mystery.
 
-How to define two loves as one is the mystery.  \
-It's obvious to many there is a thing called God, \
-and just as obvious that there is one called love.  \
-Maybe we fool ourselves, we who can't be alone; \
-maybe we don't know what either God or love is.  \
-Maybe, and perhaps; but I for one propose
+| How to define two loves as one is the mystery.
+| It's obvious to many there is a thing called God,
+| and just as obvious that there is one called love.
+| Maybe we fool ourselves, we who can't be alone;
+| maybe we don't know what either God or love is.
+| Maybe, and perhaps; but I for one propose
 
-that we as only humans are not supposed \
-to know or understand capital-L Life, that mystery.  \
-Isn't it enough to know that God is  \
-love, and love is God,  \
-no matter which one \
-does or does not exist?  What is life, if no love,
+| that we as only humans are not supposed
+| to know or understand capital-L Life, that mystery.
+| Isn't it enough to know that God is
+| love, and love is God,
+| no matter which one
+| does or does not exist?  What is life, if no love,
 
-if no God?  [Maybe][Maybe1] this saying, "God is love," \
-is less a definition of God what what love is supposed \
-to be.  Of these two terms, [maybe2][] the one \
-we should capitalize is Love, that great mystery \
-of chemistry and longing.  Maybe "Love is god" \
-is a more fitting [epigraph][] for what life is
+| if no God?  [Maybe][Maybe1] this saying, "God is love,"
+| is less a definition of God what what love is supposed
+| to be.  Of these two terms, [maybe2][] the one
+| we should capitalize is Love, that great mystery
+| of chemistry and longing.  Maybe "Love is god"
+| is a more fitting [epigraph][] for what life is
 
-[made of:][made of] Love, that most delicate, most misty \
-
-of all emotions, is supposed to be their god, \
-as the one that binds us, that was, that will be, that is.
+| [made of:][made of] Love, that most delicate, most misty
+| of all emotions, is supposed to be their god,
+| as the one that binds us, that was, that will be, that is.
 
 [is]: i-wanted-to-tell-you-something.html
 [God is love]: https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1+John+4%3A8&version=NIV