about summary refs log tree commit diff stats
path: root/words-irritable-reaching.river
blob: 22b984cdf6897ef256ad02557af6dbc74eff354e (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
somewhere
i
remember
reading
advice
for
beginning
writers
not
to
show
their
work
to
anyone
at
least
that
in
the
early
stages
the
author
argued
that
it
took
all
of
the
power
out
of
the
idea
like
a
pressure-release
valve
before
any
of
that
creative
power
got
to
be
applied
to
the
page
it
made
me
think
of
meditation
at
legunitas
when
hass
writes
that
each
particular
erases
/
the
luminous
clarity
of
a
general
idea
as
a
self-confessed
general
idea
person
i
identify
with
the
remark
it
does
seem
as
though
no
matter
how
lofty
the
idea
i
originally
have
for
a
poem
once
i
sit
down
to
write
the
thing
i
quickly
get
bogged
down
in
the
details
the
particulars
i
guess
the
writer
of
that
lost
article
must
work
the
same
way
leading
to
their
advice
if
the
luminous
clarity
of
a
general
idea
is
so
fragile
that
just
beginning
to
write
it
down
ruins
it
somehow
telling
people
about
it
is
even
worse
but
back
to
that
robert
hass
poem
while
he
does
say
that
thing
about
the
luminous
clarity
of
a
general
idea
and
he
adds
to
it
that
a
word
is
elegy
to
what
it
signifies
his
tone
is
lightly
chiding
this
philosophy
he
opens
his
poem
with
all
the
new
thinking
is
about
loss
/
in
this
it
resembles
all
the
old
thinking
which
to
my
mind
lampoons
both
the
new
and
the
old
thinking
for
not
having
anything
new
ultimately
to
say
he
attributes
these
thoughts
to
a
friend
whose
voice
carried
a
thin
wire
of
grief
a
tone
/
almost
querulous
about
that
loss
of
luminous
clarity
the
speaker
of
hass's
poem
remembers
a
woman
he
made
love
to
once
and
this
image
takes
over
the
poem
in
all
its
specificity
from
her
small
shoulders
to
his
childhood
river
/
with
its
island
willows
to
the
way
her
hands
dismantled
bread
even
in
disproving
his
friend's
remarks
through
his
imagery
the
speaker
of
meditation
at
legunitas
admits
that
it
hardly
had
to
do
with
her
and
here
is
the
heart
of
what
hass
is
saying
about
poetry
a
poem
hardly
has
to
do
with
what
it
is
written
about
on
the
surface
level
as
richard
hugo
says
it
in
a
famous
essay
a
poem
has
a
triggering
subject
and
it
has
a
real
or
generated
subject
which
for
hugo
in
meditation
at
legunitas
is
something
about
the
way
that
not
only
general
ideas
but
particulars
such
as
the
body
or
hands
or
the
thing
her
father
said
that
hurt
her
which
is
such
a
beautiful
generality
that
is
somehow
also
a
particular
truth
are
luminous
to
poetry
and
to
life-as-lived
the
philosophers
can
say
what
they
want
but
we
experience
the
world
bodily
and
particularly
to
ourselves
there's
still
a
problem
with
language
however
to
which
hass
speaks
by
the
end
of
his
poem
with
those
repetitions
of
blackberry
blackberry
blackberry
in
that
as
jack
gilbert
says
in
his
poem
the
forgotten
dialect
of
the
heart
how
astonishing
it
is
that
language
can
almost
mean
/
but
frightening
that
it
does
not
quite
there
is
still
that
irritable
reaching
after
fact
reason
that
language
as
communication
requires
i
think
keats
would
agree
that
he
wrote
about
a
near-unattainable
ideal
in
his
letter
that
only
shakespeare
and
maybe
coleridge
and
a
few
others
could
achieve
this
negative
capability
gilbert
furthers
keats
in
asserting
that
no
matter
what
we
write
the
words
/
get
it
wrong
that
utterance
is
itself
that
irritable
reaching
in
gilbert's
poem
though
he
does
reach
after
something
in
the
second
half
of
the
poem
he
begins
to
imagine
what
the
mysterious
sumerian
tablets
could
be
as
poetry
instead
of
just
business
records
my
joy
is
the
same
as
twelve
ethiopian
goats
standing
in
the
morning
light
o
lord
thou
art
slabs
of
salt
and
ingots
of
copper
as
grand
as
ripe
barley
under
the
wind's
labor
her
breasts
are
six
white
oxen
loaded
with
bolts
of
long-fibered
egyptian
cotton
my
love
is
a
hundred
pitchers
of
honey
shiploads
of
thuya
are
what
my
body
wants
to
say
to
your
body
giraffes
are
this
desire
in
the
dark
this
is
my
favorite
part
of
the
poem
and
i
think
it
is
because
gilbert
like
hass
reaches
for
the
specific
in
the
general
he
brings
huge
ideas
like
the
lord
or
love
or
joy
into
the
specific
images
of
salt
copper
or
honey
or
like
he
says
at
the
end
of
his
poem
what
we
feel
most
has
/
no
name
but
amber
archers
cinnamon
horses
and
birds
this
ultimately
is
what
keats
was
getting
at
and
hugo
too
that
the
real
subject
of
any
poetry
is
not
capturable
in
the
words
of
the
poem
but
that
rather
a
poem
speaks
around
its
subject
to
be
honest
all
art
may
do
this
what
sets
a
poem
apart
is
its
honesty
about
that
fact